Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998

In re the Claim of De Salvo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided April 2, 1998

249 A.D.2d 619; 670 N.Y.S.2d 939; 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3595

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

In re the Claim of Hughes (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2000)
In re the Claim of Hammer (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1999)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed January 16, 1997, which reduced claimant’s weekly unemployment, insurance benefit rate to zero.

Substantial evidence supports the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board reducing claimant’s benefit rate to zero. The record establishes that claimant received a monthly pension which had been fully funded by the employer. Consequently, claimant’s unemployment insurance benefits were properly reduced by the amount of her pension benefits (see, Labor Law § 600 [7]; Matter of Levin [Sweeney], 244 AD2d 642).

Mikoll, J. P., Mercure, White, Peters and Carpinello, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.