Dempski v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
Opinion of the Court
—Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied that part of plaintiffs’ discovery motion seeking to compel production of all pleadings against defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (State Farm) “in actions seeking to set aside Releases for cases brought in the [Eighth] Judicial
The court erred, however, in denying that part of plaintiffs’ motion for an in camera inspection of the adjuster’s notes, beginning with the filing of the claim until the signing of the release, and we modify the order by granting that part of plaintiffs’ motion. Although the adjuster’s notes were unquestionably prepared in contemplation of litigation, plaintiffs have demonstrated their substantial need for the notes in preparation of their case and that the notes or their equivalent are not otherwise obtainable by them (see, CPLR 3101 [d] [2]; DiMichel v South Buffalo Ry. Co., 80 NY2d 184, 196; Mardiros v Ghaly, 206 AD2d 413, 414). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Genesee County, Dillon, J. — Discovery.) Present — Lawton, J. P., Hayes, Wisner, Boehm and Fallon, JJ. (Filed Mar. 16, 1998.)
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.