Armbruster v. In the Woods Ass'n
Opinion of the Court
—Order and judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Plaintiff was injured when she slipped and fell on a patch of black ice on the sidewalk outside her daughter’s townhouse. She commenced this negligence action against the homeowners’ association, defendant In the Woods Association, Inc. (Association), and the snow removal contractor, defendant Tim Kerr Landscaping (Kerr). Supreme Court properly granted the motion of Kerr for summary judgment dismissing the complaint against it. Kerr did not assume a duty of care to plaintiff by virtue of its snow removal contract with the Association (see, Roesch v Hillick, 247 AD2d 927; Pieri v Forest City Enters., 238 AD2d 911; Autrino v Hausrath’s Landscape Maintenance, 231 AD2d 943, Iv denied 89 NY2d 812). There is no proof that plaintiff detrimentally relied upon the continued performance
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.