Slivkina v. County of Westchester
Slivkina v. County of Westchester
250 A.D.2d 754; 672 N.Y.S.2d 780
Opinion of the Court
—In two related actions, inter alia, to recover damages for false arrest, false imprisonment, and malicious prosecution, the plaintiffs in Action Nos. 1 and 2
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
The jury’s verdict was based upon a fair interpretation of the evidence and we discern no reason to disturb it (see, Nicastro v Park, 113 AD2d 129).
The plaintiffs’ remaining contentions are without merit. O’Brien, J. P., Santucci, Joy and McGinity, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.