Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998

Beal Bank, SSB v. Sandpiper Resort Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided June 8, 1998

251 A.D.2d 360; 674 N.Y.S.2d 83; 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6654

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

County of Greene v. Chalifoux (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2015)
Pollina v. Blatt (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1999)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

—In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendants Daniel Barbiero and Mark Mashburn appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Hall, J.), dated May 28, 1997, as granted the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment and denied their cross motion to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against them, (2) an order of the same court, dated August 5, 1997, as, in effect, upon reargument, adhered to so much of the determination made in the order dated May 28, 1997, as granted the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment and denied their cross motion to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against them, and (3) a judgment of the same court entered September 16, 1997, as directed them to pay any deficiency after a sale of the mortgaged premises.

Ordered that the appeals from the orders are dismissed; and it is further,

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from; and it is further,

Ordered that the respondent is awarded one bill of costs.

The appeals from the intermediate orders must be dismissed because the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of judgment in the action (see, Matter of Aho, 39 NY2d 241, 248). The issues raised on the appeals from the orders are brought up for review and have been considered on the appeal from the judgment (see, CPLR 5501 [a] [1]).

*361Contrary to the appellants’ contention, the guarantees of payment at issue were executed by them to guarantee a loan made by Enzo, Ltd., d/b/a The Sandpiper Resort. Therefore, the appellants were not discharged under the bankruptcy reorganization plan and confirmation order of Cold Spring Bay Owners f/k/a Sandpiper Resort Corp. Moreover, by the unqualified language contained in the guarantees, the guarantees are enforceable even if the principal escapes liability (see, Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co. v Green, 95 AD2d 737; Standard Brands v Straile, 23 AD2d 363). Sullivan, J. P., Joy, Krausman and Florio, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.