Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998

183 Holding Corp. v. 183 Lorraine Street Associates

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided June 8, 1998

251 A.D.2d 386; 673 N.Y.S.2d 745; 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6632

Cases that cite this one

9 later published cases cite this decision.

FT Travel-New York, LLC v. Your Travel Center, Inc. (United States District Court for the Central District of California 2015)
Shortell v. County of Rockland (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2012)
Shortell v. County of Rockland (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2012)
Rubenstein v. Mayor (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2007)
442 Decatur Street, LLC v. Spheres Realty, Inc. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2005)
United Capital Corp. v. 183 Lorraine Street Associates (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2000)
United Capital Corp. v. 183 Lorraine Street Associates (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2000)
United Capital Corp. v. 183 Lorraine Street Associates (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1999)
United Capital Corp. v. 183 Lorraine Street Associates (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1999)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

—In an action, inter alia, for specific performance of a contract for the sale of real property, the plaintiff 183 Holding Corp. and the nonparties Joseph Fischer and Joseph Fischer d/b/a 183 Holding Corp. appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Dowd, J.), entered June 27, 1997, which, inter alia, denied those branches of their motion which were to add Joseph Fischer and Joseph Fischer d/b/a 183 Holding Corp. as additional plaintiffs and to drop the intervenor defendant United Capital Corp. as a defendant, and granted the cross motion by the intervenor defendant United Capital Corp. to dismiss the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff seeks, inter alia, specific performance of a real estate contract dated April 1990 which was executed by the defendant 183 Lorraine Street Associates as seller, and the plaintiff as purchaser. However, the plaintiff, a corporation, did not come into existence until October 1991, i.e., 18 months later, when its certificate of incorporation was filed (see, Business Corporation Law § 403). Under these circumstances, the Supreme Court properly held that the plaintiff lacked the capacity to contract in April 1990. At the time of the execution of the contract, the plaintiff was a “purported entity which *387‘cannot * * * acquire rights by contract or otherwise’ ” (see, Kiamesha Dev. Corp. v Guild Props., 4 NY2d 378, 389, quoting 18 CJS, Corporations, § 88). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly dismissed the complaint.

The plaintiffs remaining contentions are without merit. Mangano, P. J., Thompson, Santucci and Altman, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.