United Capital Corp. v. 183 Lorraine Street Associates
Cases that cite this one
18 later published cases cite this decision. The 17 that cite it most often are listed here.
- Norwest Mortgage, Inc. v. Brown (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2006)
- First Union Baptist Church of the Bronx v. TD Capital Group LLC (In re First Union Baptist Church of the Bronx) (United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York 2017)
- United States v. Chesir (District Court, E.D. New York 2016)
- Cerrato v. BAC Home Loans Servicing (In re Cerrato) (United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York 2014)
- NYCTL 1996-1 Trust v. Moore (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2008)
- Kolkunova v. Guaranteed Home Mortgage Co. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2007)
- Bank of New York v. Ortiz (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2006)
- In re Mizuno (United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York 2002)
- NYCTL 1996-1 Trust v. Jellerette (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2008)
- Wells Fargo Bank v. Carney (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2008)
- In re: Sandralee Rodgers, Debtor, Sandralee Rodgers v. County of Monroe, William M. Lissow, and George M. Reiber (2d Cir. 2003)
- NYCTL 1996-1 Trust v. LFJ Realty Corp. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2003)
- Aronian v. Double R Associates, L.P. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2002)
- United Capital Corp. v. 183 Lorraine Street Associates (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2000)
- United Capital Corp. v. 183 Lorraine Street Associates (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2000)
- United Capital Corp. v. 183 Lorraine Street Associates (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1999)
- United Capital Corp. v. 183 Lorraine Street Associates (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1999)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
—In two related actions, inter alia, to foreclose upon a mortgage, the defendant French Bourekas, Inc., and the nonparties 183 Holding Corp., Joseph Fischer, and Joseph Fischer d/b/a 183 Holding Corp. appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Shaw, J.), entered March 25, 1997, which denied their motion, inter alia, to redeem certain real property on behalf of the defendant French Bourekas, Inc., and intervention and redemption on behalf of the nonparties.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
It is well settled that the owner of the equity of redemption has a right to redeem at any time before an actual sale under a judgment of foreclosure (see, Belsid Holding Corp. v Dahm, 12 AD2d 499; see also, Bancplus Mtge. Corp. v Galloway, 203 AD2d 222; Finance Inv. Co. v Gossweiler, 145 AD2d 463; Polish Natl. Alliance v White Eagle Hall Co., 98 AD2d 400; First Fed. Sav. & Loan Assn. v Smith, 83 AD2d 601). Thus, the foreclosure sale which took place on March 4, 1997, extinguished, as a matter of law, the appellants’ purported rights to redeem the subject property. Accordingly, the motion was properly denied. Mangano, P. J., Thompson, Santucci and Altman, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.