King v. King
Cases that cite this one
7 later published cases cite this decision.
- Richard W. v. Maribel G. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2010)
- King v. King (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2005)
- Kranock v. Ranieri (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2005)
- Pinkerton v. Pensyl (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2003)
- Roody v. Charles (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2001)
- Oliver v. Oliver (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2001)
- Seymour v. Seymour (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1999)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
—Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Family Court properly denied the petition seeking legal and
We agree with petitioner that the court erred in ordering that “there should be a change in the jurisdiction in future matters in regards to these proceedings to the State of California”. The parties did not raise any jurisdictional issues in this proceeding, and the issue of jurisdiction in future proceedings must await an actual controversy. Thus, we modify the order by vacating the 17th ordering paragraph.
We have considered the remaining contentions of petitioner and conclude that they are without merit. (Appeal from Order of Oswego County Family Court, Hedges, J. — Custody.) Present — Denman, P. J., Green, Pigott, Jr., Balio and Boehm, JJ.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.