People v. Martinez
Opinion of the Court
—Appeal by the
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]).
Further, contrary to the defendant’s contention, the court did not err in denying that branch of his omnibus motion which was to suppress statements he made to the police. The statements were taken prior to his attorney’s entrance into the case (see, People v Snell, 239 AD2d 529).
The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Ritter, J. P., Santucci, Joy and Florio, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.