In re the Claim of Foley
Cases that cite this one
7 later published cases cite this decision.
- In re the Claim of Lau-Li (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2000)
- In re the Claim of Jorge (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2000)
- In re the Claim of Lipford (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2000)
- In re the Claim of Roper (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2000)
- In re the Claim of Dunn (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2000)
- In re the Claim of Hungerford (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2000)
- In re the Claim of Lawery (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2000)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed April 15, 1997, which, upon reconsideration, adhered to its prior decision dismissing claimant’s appeal from a decision of an Administrative Law Judge as untimely.
By decision dated and mailed June 1, 1993, an Administrative Law Judge, inter alia, ruled that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because she was not available for employment. Although claimant acknowledged that she received the June 1, 1993 decision soon after it was mailed, she failed to file an appeal for nearly three years. Inasmuch as claimant failed to comply with the 20-day filing requirement of Labor Law § 621 (1), the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board dismissing claimant’s appeal as untimely must be upheld (see, Matter of Speed [Sweeney], 243 AD2d 807; Matter of Banks [Sweeney], 232 AD2d 797).
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.