People v. Lassic
Opinion of the Court
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the hearing court properly determined that the stop of his vehicle was based on reasonable suspicion (see, People v Hicks, 68 NY2d 234; People v De Bour, 40 NY2d 210; People v Ryan, 224 AD2d 644; People v Bianchi, 208 AD2d 551, 552, affd 85 NY2d 1022; People v Mills, 198 AD2d 236; People v Bedoya, 190 AD2d 812). Consequently, the evidence recovered as a result of the stop was admissible.
The defendant’s remaining contention is without merit. Bracken, J. P., Copertino, Goldstein and McGinity, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.