Clark v. Weiner
Cases that cite this one
9 later published cases cite this decision.
- In re Riven Flamebaum (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2012)
- In re Riven Flamebaum (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2012)
- Verderber v. Commander Enterprises Centereach, LLC (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2011)
- Ramirez v. City of New York (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2011)
- Lester & Associates, P.C. v. Eneman (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2010)
- In re Noelia T. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2010)
- Zoref v. Glassman (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2007)
- Davidson-Sakuma v. Sakuma (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2001)
- Meachum v. Outdoor World Corp. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2000)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for legal malpractice, the plaintiffs appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Meehan, J.), entered September 25, 1997, as made findings of fact and conclusions of law.
Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.
The parts of the order from which the plaintiffs appeal are not embodied in a decretal paragraph and do not otherwise grant or deny relief. Rather, they are part of findings of fact and conclusions of law which are not independently appealable (see, Booska v Booska, 246 AD2d 567; Matter of County of Westchester v O’Neill, 191 AD2d 556; Matter of Smart v Lefkowitz, 49 AD2d 882; Benedetto v O’Grady, 10 AD2d 628). O’Brien, J. P., Ritter, Thompson, Friedmann and Goldstein, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.