People v. Archeval
Opinion of the Court
—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Marras, J.), rendered November
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50.
The search warrant and supporting affidavit at issue sufficiently described the area to be searched (see, People v Nieves, 36 NY2d 396, 401; People v Graham, 220 AD2d 769, 771), and the warrant was not overbroad (see, People v Bogdan, 59 AD2d 1026).
The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit (see, People v Anderson, 190 AD2d 741; People v Bouzy, 242 AD2d 729). Copertino, J. P., Sullivan, Pizzuto and Goldstein, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.