In re Fletcher
Opinion of the Court
Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court in 1997. The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania ordered her disbarment in August 1998. She was admitted in Pennsylvania in 1984.
It appears that, in 1996, respondent converted to her own use $1,000 belonging to her clients. Thereafter, she ignored letters from the clients asking for the money and in reply to the inquiry from the Pennsylvania disciplinary authorities, she falsely represented that she had returned the $1,000 to the clients and, in fact, forwarded a fabricated letter indicating the return of the money to the disciplinary authorities.
We grant the unopposed motion by petitioner, the Committee on Professional Standards, for an order imposing reciprocal discipline upon respondent (see, 22 NYCRR 806.19) and, under the circumstances, order respondent’s disbarment in this State (see, e.g., Matter of Sturgis, 242 AD2d 831).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.