In re Khalif F.
Opinion of the Court
—Order of disposi
The court’s fact-finding determination that the victim suffered “physical injury” (Penal Law § 10.00 [9]) and that such injury was intended by appellant was not against the weight of the evidence (see, People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490). Inconsistencies in testimony and other matters relating to credibility were properly presented to the trier of facts and we see no reason to disturb its findings. Given these credibility determinations, there was ample evidence supporting the elements of assault in the third degree. Concur — Milonas, J. P., Ellerin, Rubin and Mazzarelli, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.