In re Jason G.
Opinion of the Court
—Order of disposi
Appellant’s suppression motion was properly denied. The suitably experienced officer’s observation of appellant exchanging small plastic envelopes for money with six customers who had formed a line in a drug-prone area, placing the money in his right pocket and something in his shoe, and then fleeing upon the officer’s approach, provided ample probable cause for appellant’s arrest (see, People v Valdes, 244 AD2d 268, lv denied 92 NY2d 862). We see no reason to disturb the court’s credibility determinations. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Milonas, Wallach, Williams and Mazzarelli, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.