Moore v. Smith
Opinion of the Court
—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendants Linda Smith and Sandra J. McMillian appeal from
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
Contrary to the appellants’ contention, they did not sustain their initial burden of establishing that they neither created nor had actual or constructive notice of the defect which allegedly caused the injured plaintiffs fall (see, Raynor v Torres, 248 AD2d 698; cf., Martines v New York City Tr. Auth., 251 AD2d 464). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied their motion for summary judgment (see, Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Ctr., 64 NY2d 851). Rosenblatt, J. P., Ritter, Copertino and Thompson, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.