Howe v. Howe
Opinion of the Court
—In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the plaintiff appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Nicolai, J.), entered February 27, 1998, as, upon reargument, adhered to a prior order
Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, with costs, and the matter is remitted for further proceedings consistent herewith.
A relocation request may be granted if it is demonstrated that relocation would be in the best interests of the children (see, Matter of Tropea v Tropea, 87 NY2d 727, 736; Matter of Blackburn v Santiago, 250 AD2d 676). Given the conflicting allegations in the parties’ affidavits, the court should not have denied, without a hearing, the plaintiffs motion for an order allowing her to relocate to Colorado (cf., Matter of Ann C. v Debra S., 221 AD2d 338). Accordingly, the matter is remitted for a hearing to determine the best interests of the children. The court is directed to appoint a Law Guardian to represent the children. Miller, J. P., Ritter, Sullivan and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.