Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998

People v. Earket

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided December 31, 1998

256 A.D.2d 1194; 683 N.Y.S.2d 465; 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14348

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

Snitzel v. Murry (District Court, W.D. New York 2004)
People v. Snitzel (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2000)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: By failing to move to withdraw his plea or to vacate the judgment of conviction, defendant failed to preserve for our review his contention that he did not voluntarily, knowingly and intelligently enter that plea (see, People v Sparrow, 222 AD2d 1114, lv denied 87 NY2d 977). Upon our review of the record, we conclude that the sentence is neither unduly harsh nor severe. (Appeal from Judgment of Cattaraugus County Court, Himelein, J.— Attempted Criminal Possession Controlled Substance, 3rd Degree.) Present — Denman, P. J., Hayes, Pigott, Jr., Callahan and Fallon, JJ.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.