Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999

In re Dinki

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided March 19, 1999

253 A.D.2d 154; 689 N.Y.S.2d 874; 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3118

Counsel

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL, Margaret C. Callarían, Buffalo, for petitioner. ., Ross L. Runfola, Buffalo, for respondent.

Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

Respondent was admitted to the practice of law by this Court on September 10, 1976, and formerly maintained an office in Williamsville. The Grievance Committee filed a petition charging respondent with three counts of professional misconduct.

Respondent has admitted the material allegations of the petition.

In mitigation, we note respondent’s prior unblemished record and that no client suffered a financial loss as a result of *155respondent’s misconduct. Accordingly, we conclude that respondent should be censured.

Pine, J. P., Hayes, Wisner, Hurlbutt and Scudder, JJ., concur.

Order of censure entered.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.