Domenech v. Associated Engineers
Opinion of the Court
—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Harold Tompkins, J.), entered July 24, 1997, which denied as untimely defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint as against them, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the motion granted and the complaint dismissed as against Associated Engineers. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of defendant-appellant Associated Engineers dismissing the complaint as against it.
The IAS Court erred in rejecting as untimely the motion by Associated Engineers (Associated) for summary judgment, since it was made within 120 days of the effective date of the amendment to CPLR 3212 (a) (see, Phoenix Garden Rest. v Chu, 245 AD2d 164; see also, Krug v Jones, 252 AD2d 572).
Turning to the merits of Associated’s claim, it is well settled that liability for an injury sustained by a worker may not be imposed upon an engineer who was hired to assure compliance with construction plans and specifications, unless the engineer
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.