Blakes v. Jacobson
Opinion of the Court
Judgment, Supreme Court, New
Given the gravity of the admitted misconduct, we do not find the sanction imposed so disproportionate to the offense as to shock our sense of fairness (see, Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222, 232-233). Petitioner’s claim, that the off-duty conduct for which he was disciplined is not actionable under department disciplinary guidelines, is waived since it was not raised in his petition or in the ensuing administrative proceedings. In any event, the claim lacks merit (see, Matter of Fox v Finnerty, 62 NY2d 796, revg 96 AD2d 905). Concur — Nardelli, J. P., Lerner, Mazzarelli and Saxe, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.