In re Mark H.
In re Mark H.
259 A.D.2d 1040; 689 N.Y.S.2d 888; 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3471
Opinion of the Court
Amended order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: In this Family Court Act article 10 proceeding alleging sexual abuse, Family Court properly gave collateral estoppel effect to respondent’s plea of guilty to charges of sexual abuse in a parallel criminal proceeding (see, Matter of Suffolk
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.