In re Kerby F.
Opinion of the Court
—Order of disposi
Appellant’s suppression motion was properly denied. The totality of the circumstances supports the court’s determination that appellant was not in custody at the time of his incriminating statement (see, Matter of Kwok T., 43 NY2d 213, 218-220; People v Yukl, 25 NY2d 585, 589, cert denied 400 US 851; Matter of Hafeesah A., 243 AD2d 255). Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Tom, Mazzarelli, Rubin and Friedman, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.