Back to Health Family Chiropractic Office, P. C. v. Murphy
Opinion of the Court
—In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of a restrictive covenant of an employment agreement, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Bellantoni, J.), dated April 21, 1998, which, upon reargument, modified a prior order of the same court (Juidice, J.), dated December 30, 1997, to the extent of denying that branch of the plaintiff’s motion which was for a permanent injunction.
The restrictive covenant of the parties’ employment agreement was reasonable and enforceable (see, Gelder Med. Group v Webber, 41 NY2d 680; Washington Sq. Inst, for Psychotherapy & Mental Health v Speciner, 259 AD2d 368; Zellner v Stephen D. Conrad, M.D., P. C., 183 AD2d 250). S. Miller, J. P., Ritter, Altman and H. Miller, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.