McGill v. New York Central Mutual Fire Ins. Co.
Opinion of the Court
—Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Plaintiff commenced this action to recover damages for injuries to his knees sustained in an automobile accident. Supreme Court properly granted that part of plaintiff’s motion to set aside the jury verdict insofar as it awards plaintiff damages of $20,000 for past pain and suffering because that award deviates materially from what would be reasonable compensation (see, CPLR 5501 [c]; Faulise v Trout, 254 AD2d 755; Crawford v Marcello, 247 AD2d 907). The court also properly granted that part of plaintiff’s motion with respect to the jury’s failure to award any damages for future lost wages and future lost household services (see, Faulise v Trout, supra; Crawford v
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.