People v. Richardson
Opinion of the Court
—Appeal by the
Ordered that the amended judgment is affirmed.
The defendant’s claim of an unreasonable delay in sentencing is not preserved for appellate review, because he never raised the issue at the time of his plea when the deferral in sentencing was discussed or at sentencing, and he never moved to vacate his plea on this ground (see, People v Marshall, 228 AD2d 15, 17-18; People v Thompson, 193 AD2d 841, 842). Mangano, P. J., Santucci, Krausman, Florio and H. Miller, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.