Baldwin v. Goord
Opinion of the Court
—Proceed
Following a tier III disciplinary hearing, petitioner, a prison inmate, was found guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rule which prohibits inmates from possessing weapons after petitioner was found in possession of a net bag containing three shank-type weapons. Petitioner’s guilt was affirmed upon administrative appeal, although the penalty was reduced, prompting him to commence this CPLR article 78 proceeding. Contrary to petitioner’s contention, we find that the detailed misbehavior report combined with petitioner’s own testimony provide substantial evidence of his guilt (see, Matter of Farid v Coombe, 236 AD2d 660). Although petitioner offered an exculpatory explanation for his possession of the net bag, this merely raised a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve (see, Matter of De La Rosa v Portuondo, 247 AD2d 810, 811). Petitioner’s remaining arguments have been examined and found to be similarly unpersuasive.
Cardona, P. J., Mercure, Peters, Carpinello and Graffeo, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.