People v. Jackson
Opinion of the Court
—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: On a retrial following this Court’s reversal of the judgment of conviction (see, People v Jackson, 226 AD2d 1090, lv denied 88 NY2d 1021), defendant was convicted of burglary in the third degree (Penal Law § 140.20) and criminal mischief in the third degree (Penal Law § 145.05). We reject the contention of defendant that he was denied the opportunity to participate meaningfully in the examination of prospective jurors at the bench because he was escorted by court officers (see, People v Vargas, 88 NY2d 363, 376). Because defendant failed to exhaust his peremptory challenges, he is foreclosed from contending that County Court erred in denying his application to dismiss a juror for cause (see, CPL 270.20 [2]; People v Rodriguez, 242 AD2d 475, lv denied 91 NY2d 879). We also reject the contention of defendant that, because he was previously acquitted of petit larceny (Penal Law § 155.25), the People were precluded from introduc
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.