Perez v. Wing
Opinion of the Court
—Determination of respondent Brian Wing (State respondent) dated July 9, 1997,
The circumstances which gave rise to petitioner’s application were a result of sudden and unforeseeable events, namely the illness and death of a relative and the temporary guardianship of her children, rather than the demands of everyday life (see, Matter of Gaillard v Lavine, 51 AD2d 181, appeal dismissed 40 NY2d 916). The City respondent’s denial was the subject of three hearings, the last after an evidentiary remand by the IAS Court. Given the resulting delay, it was improper to consider petitioner’s changed circumstances after the initial denial of her emergency application (see, Matter of Wilson v Blum, 101 Misc 2d 256). Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Williams, Andrias, Saxe and Buckley, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.