Santiago v. 1370 Broadway Associates, L.P.
Cases that cite this one
14 later published cases cite this decision. The 13 that cite it most often are listed here.
- David Lerner Associates, Inc. v. Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance (District Court, E.D. New York 2013)
- Cunningham v. Insurance Co. of North America (District Court, E.D. New York 2007)
- Von Hoffmann v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America (District Court, S.D. New York 2002)
- Thomas, the Lord of Shalford v. Shelley's Jewelry, Inc. (District Court, W.D. North Carolina 2000)
- Rooney v. Thorson (2d Cir. 2000)
- Wirth v. Domerson (District Court, S.D. New York 2023)
- Ratusch v. Attas (Civil Court of the City of New York 2004)
- Leather v. United States Trust Co. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2001)
- Trombley v. Poissant & Nichols, P. C. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2001)
- In re Dawnwood Properties/78 (2d Cir. 2000)
- Chase Scientific Research, Inc. v. NIA Group, Inc. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2000)
- Marson Construction Corp. v. Illinois Union Insurance (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2000)
- 20 Clarke Place Realty Corp. v. Rudges & Co. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1999)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Jerry Crispino, J.), entered March 2, 1998, which, to the extent appealed from, granted third-party defendant Essential Coverage Corp.’s motion for summary judgment dismissing this particular third-party complaint as time-barred, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the third-party complaint reinstated.
Malpractice is the negligence of a professional toward a person for whom a service is rendered (1 Weinstein-Korn-Miller, NY Civ Prac ¶ 214.24). A “profession” is an occupation generally associated with long-term educational requirements leading to an advanced degree, licensure evidencing qualifications met prior to engaging in the occupation, and control of
The applicable Statute of Limitations here is six years (CPLR 213), based upon the contractual relationship between the parties in this third-party action (National Life Ins. Co. v Hall & Co., 67 NY2d 1021; see, AJ Contr. Co. v Trident Mgrs., 234 AD2d 195). To the extent that our opinion in AJ Contr. Co. might be read to include insurance brokers as “professionals” for purpose of the non-medical professional malpractice Statute of Limitations, we now disavow such an implication. An insurance broker is not capable of committing “professional malpractice” in accordance with CPLR 214 (6).
The Statute began to run upon the insured’s receipt of the certificate of insurance (Hennessey v General Acc. Ins. Co., 257 AD2d 750). Accordingly, there should be a factual determination as to whether this action was timely commenced within six years of such receipt. Concur — Nardelli, J. P., Williams, Tom, Wallach and Andrias, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.