Martin v. Bernsley
Opinion of the Court
—In an action to
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The appellant did not meet her burden of establishing usury by clear and convincing evidence (see, Giventer v Arnow, 37 NY2d 305; Lloyd Capital Corp. v Pat Henchar, Inc., 80 NY2d 124; Feinberg v Old Vestal Rd. Assocs., 157 AD2d 1002).
The appellant’s remaining contentions do not require reversal. Joy, J. P., Friedmann, Goldstein and McGinity, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.