Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999

In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a

In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided October 29, 1999
265 A.D.2d 795; 697 N.Y.S.2d 536
In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a

Opinion of the Court

—Per Curiam.

Respondent, who was admitted to practice by the Second Department in 1979, was suspended by this Court’s order dated June 7, 1999, for failure to comply with the attorney registration requirements of section 468-a of the Judiciary Law (262 AD2d 702).

Respondent has now complied with the registration requirements of section 468-a of the Judiciary Law and has paid the fees as required by the statute and Rules of the Chief Administrator of the Courts. Petitioner Committee on Professional Standards does not object to respondent’s instant application for reinstatement.

Respondent’s application is granted and he is ordered reinstated, effective immediately.

Cardona, P. J., Mikoll, Mercure, Crew III and Yesawich Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that respondent’s application is granted, *796and it is further ordered that respondent is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective immediately.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.