Clarke v. Urlick
Clarke v. Urlick
266 A.D.2d 177; 697 N.Y.S.2d 518; 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11108
Opinion of the Court
βIn an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant Lawrence Marcus appeals from an order of the
Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The appellant failed to provide a reasonable excuse for his default or a meritorious defense as required by CPLR 5015 in order to obtain vacatur of the judgment (see, Kavanagh v Demitrieus, 259 AD2d 523; Furon Constr. v Velez, 209 AD2d 666). S. Miller, J. P., Thompson, Krausman, Florio and Schmidt, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.