People v. Nuesi
Opinion of the Court
—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Notwithstanding that the defendant’s right to counsel had attached, the record supports the hearing court’s finding that the defendant’s statement was spontaneous and not the result of any improper conduct or questioning. Therefore, the statement was properly admitted into evidence (see, People v Gonzales, 75 NY2d 938, cert denied 498 US 833; People v Ellis, 58 NY2d 748; People v Rivers, 56 NY2d 476; People v Lynes, 49 NY2d 286).
The defendant’s remaining contentions are unpreserved for appellate review and, in any event, are without merit. Joy, J. P., Goldstein, McGinity and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.