Bogenrieder v. Crippen Heating & Air Conditioning
Opinion of the Court
—Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs, motions granted and complaint against defendant Church of God in Christ WNY Jurisdiction, II dismissed. Memorandum: Church of God in Christ WNY Jurisdiction, II (defendant) appeals from an order denying its motion to renew its prior motion for summary judgment. Even though defendant abandoned its appeal from an earlier order denying its motion for summary judgment and this appeal is subject to dismissal (see, Rubeo v National Grange Mut. Ins. Co., 93 NY2d 750; see also, Bray v Cox, 38 NY2d 350), we have discretion to entertain the appeal in a proper case (see, Faricelli v TSS Seedman’s, 94 NY2d 722; see also, Aridas v Caserta, 41 NY2d 1059, 1061). In a prior appeal by codefendant Crippen Heating & Air Conditioning (Crippen), we held that Crippen was entitled to summary judgment dismissing the complaint against it because, inter alia, Ernest Bogenrieder (plaintiff) does not come within
The dismissal of the direct causes of action requires the dismissal of the derivative cause of action. We therefore modify the order by granting the motion to renew and on renewal granting the prior motion for summary judgment and dismissing the complaint against defendant. (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Notaro, J. — Renewal.) Present— Pine, J. P., Lawton, Hayes, Wisner and Scudder, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.