Ross v. Blaine
Opinion of the Court
—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Clinton County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
Following a tier III disciplinary hearing, petitioner, a prison inmate, was found guilty of verbally harassing a correction officer and refusing a direct order to lock-in his cell. According to the misbehavior report, petitioner became verbally abusive after the reporting correction officer asked if he had any medical documentation to support his claim that he had to leave the exercise yard whenever it rained.
The detailed misbehavior report combined with the testimony of the reporting correction officer and other correction officers
Cardona, P. J., Mikoll, Yesawich Jr., Spain and Mugglin, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
It was explained at the hearing that petitioner wears metal braces and also wears an electrical device that emits an electric impulse current.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.