Apple v. State
Cases that cite this one
2 later published cases cite this decision.
- Monopoli v. County of Nassau (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2002)
- Petri v. Half Off Cards, Inc. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2001)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
—In an action, inter alla, to recover damages for fraudulent concealment, breach of contract, indemnification for costs incurred in cleaning up a petroleum discharge pursuant to Navigation Law article 12, and for a judgment declaring, among other things, that the plaintiffs are not liable to the State of New York for costs
Ordered that the plaintiffs’ appeal from so much of the order as determined that “to the extent that liability or portion of liability is based upon mere current ownership without fault, then, to the extent that liability or any portion of that liability is found attributable to [the Sorbaro defendants], the [Sorbaro defendants] will be strictly liable to the plaintiffs for reimbursement of such monies paid”, including attorney’s fees, is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, as the plaintiffs are not aggrieved by that portion of the order (see, CPLR 5511); and it is further,
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as reviewed, without costs or disbursements.
The Supreme Court properly denied that branch of the plaintiffs’ motion which was for summary judgment declaring that they are not liable to the State of New York (hereinafter the State) for costs incurred in investigating and remediating the petroleum discharge (see, Navigation Law § 181 [1]; White v Long, 85 NY2d 564; Huntington Hosp. v Anron Heating & Air Conditioning, 250 AD2d 814; Matter of White v Regan, 171 AD2d 197; Navigation Law § 181 [5]).
The parties are not entitled to summary judgment on the issue of indemnification because there are questions of fact concerning which of the parties actually caused the discharge of petroleum (see, Navigation Law § 181 [5]; White v Long, supra).
The parties’ remaining contentions are without merit. Bracken, J. P., Thompson, Friedmann and Smith, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.