Mealer v. Selsky
Cases that cite this one
2 later published cases cite this decision.
- Soto v. New York State Department of Correctional Services (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2000)
- Brisman v. Senkowski (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2000)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
As petitioner entered a knowing and voluntary guilty plea, he is precluded from challenging the determination of his guilt on the ground of insufficient evidence (see, Matter of Grant v Goord, 247 AD2d 662; see also, Matter of Miller v Goord, 262 AD2d 906). With respect to petitioner’s remaining issues, they are similarly unpreserved for our review since petitioner failed to raise them on his administrative appeal (see, Matter of De La Rosa v Goord, 260 AD2d 824; Matter of Walton v Selsky, 251 AD2d 798). Nevertheless, to the extent these issues are before us, they are found to be without merit.
Cardona, P. J., Crew III, Peters, Graffeo and Mugglin, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.