Branigan v. Safir
Branigan v. Safir
269 A.D.2d 165; 701 N.Y.S.2d 900; 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1050
Opinion of the Court
—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Helen Freedman, J.), entered on or about July
For the reasons stated in Matter of Williams v Safir (265 AD2d 182), we reject petitioner’s argument that because of McKinney’s Unconsolidated Laws of NY § 891 (L 1940, ch 834), he could not be terminated without a hearing. Concur — Nardelli, J. P., Rubin, Andrias, Buckley and Friedman, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.