Stroh v. Gross
Opinion of the Court
—In an action for a preliminary injunction
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The defendant demonstrated that the proposed construction of the detached screened structure on her property would not violate local zoning requirements, and that the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of Bellport previously denied only her application to build an attached, screened-in porch. In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact. Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and vacated the preliminary injunction (see, Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320).
The plaintiffs remaining contentions are without merit. Bracken, J. P., Sullivan, Altman and Friedmann, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.