Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000

People v. Samuels

People v. Samuels
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided February 16, 2000
269 A.D.2d 859; 703 N.Y.S.2d 768; 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1819
People v. Samuels

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We reject the contention of defendant that County Court impermissibly penalized him for exercising his right to go to trial. “The imposition of a more severe sentence after trial than that offered to defendant pursuant to a plea offer that he rejected, without more, does not support the contention of defendant that he was penalized for exercising his right to go to trial” (People v Jones, 229 AD2d 980, lv denied 89 NY2d 925). (Appeal from Judgment of Ontario County Court, Harvey, J. — Criminal Possession Controlled Substance, 3rd Degree.) Present — Green, A. P. J., Wisner, Pigott, Jr., Hurlbutt and Scudder, JJ.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.