ELRAC, Inc. v. Fajardo
Cases that cite this one
3 later published cases cite this decision.
- Damadian MRI in Garden City, P.C. v. Progressive Casualty Insurance (Civil Court of the City of New York 2003)
- Matter of Government Empls. Ins. Co. v. Sarmiento (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2025)
- Gallagher Bassett Services, Inc. v. Makerevich (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2001)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
βIn a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to stay arbitration of an uninsured motorist claim, Allstate Insurance Company appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Floyd, J.), dated January 25, 1999, which granted the petition staying arbitration against the petitioner, and directed that arbitration proceed against it.
Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the petition is denied, and the petitioner is directed to proceed to arbitration with Azalea Fajardo.
Azalea Fajardo was involved in a collision with an unknown driver while operating a car that she rented from the petitioner ELRAC, Inc., d/b/a Enterprise Rent-A-Car (hereinafter ELRAC), a self-insured automobile rental company. The rental agreement signed by Fajardo provided that personal injury and uninsured motorist protection were not included and that the renter waived any claims thereto. At the time of the collision, Fajardo was independently insured by Allstate Insurance Company (hereinafter Allstate).
After Fajardo filed a demand for arbitration of her uninsured motorist claim, ELRAC commenced this proceeding to stay
The Supreme Court erred in granting the petition. ELRAC is obligated by law to provide primary uninsured motorist benefits and, consequently, the waiver in the rental agreement is unenforceable (see, Matter of ELRAC, Inc. v Edwards, 270 AD2d 414 [decided herewith]).
In light of our determination, it is unnecessary to address the remaining contention of Allstate. Bracken, J. P., Ritter, Altman and McGinity, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.