Scheifla v. Benchmark Management Corp.
Opinion of the Court
—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied the motion of Benchmark Management Corporation, the manager of an office building, and Maple Development Associates, the owner of the building, (defendants) for summary judgment dismissing the amended complaint against them. Plaintiff alleged that she suffered injury because the elevator “misleveled”. Defendants “may not be held liable for injuries resulting from an elevator malfunction where, as here, [the owner of the building] had an exclusive maintenance contract with * * * an elevator company, to inspect, maintain and repair the elevator and [neither defendant] had [either] actual [or] constructive notice of a defective condition” (Browning v Meadowlands Professional Park, 254 AD2d 725). Here, defendants failed to meet their initial burden of establishing lack of notice as a matter of law.
Defendants submitted the affidavit of their maintenance manager stating that defendants had not received any notice
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.