In re Rasyn W.
Cases that cite this one
4 later published cases cite this decision.
- Matter of Kaylee D. (Kimberly D.) (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2017)
- Matter of Shonyo v. Shonyo (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2017)
- CURRY, TORRENCE P. v. REESE, LATOYA D. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2016)
- In re Derrick T. M. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2001)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Respondent contends that she was denied due process of law and a fair hearing because of Family Court’s “relentless, hostile, and derisive” questions. That contention is not preserved for our review, and, in any event, lacks merit. Although it appears that the court, respondent, and respondent’s attorney engaged in some tense verbal exchanges, the record establishes that the court’s questions were designed to clarify respondent’s testimony and the best interests of the child (see, Matter of Stanziano v Stanziano, 235 AD2d 845, 846). The record does not establish that the court was biased or prejudiced against respondent, and thus we perceive no reason to reverse the order and to remit the matter to a different Judge (see, Family Ct Act § 340.2 [3] [b]; see also, Matter of Jamar W., 269 AD2d 103). (Appeal from Order of Erie County
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.