Smith v. East Ramapo Central School District
Opinion of the Court
—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiff Ryan Smith appeals, as limited by his brief, from so
Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, that branch of the defendant’s motion which was to dismiss the action insofar as it was asserted on behalf of the plaintiff Ryan Smith is denied, and the complaint is reinstated insofar as asserted on behalf of Ryan Smith.
The complaint must be reinstated insofar as asserted on behalf of the plaintiff Ryan Smith, as during his infancy, CPLR 208 tolled the limitations period of General Municipal Law § 50-i (see, Henry v City of New York, 94 NY2d 275). Ritter, J. P., Sullivan, S. Miller, Luciano and H. Miller, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.