Hogan v. Hogan
Cases that cite this one
22 later published cases cite this decision.
- Habib v. Habib (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2000)
- Matter of Garbarino v. Garbarino (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2014)
- Oakes v. Oakes (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2014)
- Oakes v. Oakes (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2014)
- Kaur v. Singh (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2013)
- Kaur v. Singh (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2013)
- Kaur v. Singh (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2012)
- Kaur v. Singh (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2012)
- Smith v. Falco-Boric (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2011)
- Willis v. Rhinehart (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2010)
- Hasbrouck v. Hasbrouck (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2009)
- Taylor v. Taylor (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2009)
- Patton v. Torres (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2007)
- In re Nicholas S. Westchester county Department of Social Services (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2007)
- Anonymous v. Anonymous (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2005)
- Garland v. Garland (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2004)
- Malfetano v. Parker (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2004)
- London v. Blazer (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2003)
- Charlene J.R. v. Walter A.M. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2003)
- Smith v. Smith (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2003)
- Dabbene v. Dabbene (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2002)
- Mazzola v. Mazzola (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2001)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
—In a family offense proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 8, the husband appeals from an order of the Family Court, Queens County (DePhillips, J.), dated October 27, 1997, which, after a hearing, granted the wife an order of protection until October 27, 1998.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
Initially, we note that although the order of protection has expired, the present appeal is not rendered academic thereby (see, Matter of Bickwid v Deutsch, 87 NY2d 862; Matter of Cindy L.S. v David L.S., 247 AD2d 543; Matter of Betz v Betz, 241 AD2d 519).
The Family Court’s denial of the husband’s request for an adjournment of the hearing was a provident exercise of discretion (see, Matter of Anthony M., 63 NY2d 270, 283; York v York, 250 AD2d 841). The husband had previously been granted an adjournment, and had been directed by the Family Court to appear for the instant hearing with counsel, which he failed to do. The evidence adduced at the hearing established that the husband committed harassment, which constituted a basis for granting the order of protection (see, Penal Law § 240.26 [3]; Family Ct Act § 812). Bracken, J. P., Ritter, Altman and McGinity, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.