People v. Colon
Opinion of the Court
—Appeal by the defen
Ordered that the judgment and the amended sentence are affirmed.
Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]).
The defendant’s sentence, as amended, was not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).
The defendant’s remaining contention is without merit. Joy, J. P., Thompson, Krausman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.