In re the Claim of Bezdezowski
Cases that cite this one
3 later published cases cite this decision.
- In re the Claim of Meade (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2004)
- In re the Claim of Loh (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2003)
- In re the Claim of Rhode (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2000)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed June 17, 1999, which ruled that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because he was not totally unemployed.
The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board found that claimant was ineligible to receive benefits because he was not totally unemployed. The record establishes that during the unemployment benefit period, claimant, who was the president and sole shareholder in a computer consulting corporation, continued to pay the corporation’s tax liabilities, insurance costs and his health and retirement benefits. Claimant also maintained the corporate checking account, handled corporate correspondence and used a cellular phone which was billed to the corporation. Notwithstanding the fact that the corporation was not profitable, as claimant stood to gain financially from his activities in furtherance of the operation of the business, we find that substantial evidence supports the Board’s decision denying claimant unemployment insurance benefits (see, Mat
Cardona, P. J., Mercure, Crew III, Graffeo and Mugglin, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.