People v. Pendergrass
Opinion of the Court
—Judgment,
The verdict was supported by legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis upon which to disturb the jury’s determinations concerning credibility and identification.
The court properly found that the People established by clear and convincing evidence that there was an independent source for a witness’s identification of defendant at trial. Although the witness observed defendant in the courtroom only a few hours before her trial testimony, and the court found this inadvertent identification procedure to be unduly suggestive, there was clear and convincing evidence that she had an independent source for her identification. The witness had an extensive, close-range opportunity to observe defendant, was able to provide a detailed description of the perpetrator to the police and indicated at the time of the crime that she would be able to identify the perpetrator (see, People v Williams, 222 AD2d 149, lv denied 88 NY2d 1072). The record supports the court’s credibility determinations made in connection with its finding of independent source. Concur — Williams, J. P., Tom, Mazzarelli and Buckley, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.